Anticipating winter

Every plant and tree knows
Summer will soon be gone
A hundred pinks and purples
Compete with their bouquets
Willow fuzz and elm pods
Lack such clever means
They only know how to fill the sky with snow.

—  韓愈 Han Yu (768-824) was a government functionary and a scholar in the Tang Dynasty.  He admired and helped to interpret Confucian thought.  He thought Buddhism was the product of barbarians, unsuited to more refined Chinese society.1

Advertisements

Antipoem

Yo galán imperfecto
Yo danzarín al borde del abismo,
I am an imperfect man
I dance on the edge of the abyss,
Yo sacristán obsceno
Niño prodigio de los basurales,
I, an obscene sexton,
Child prodigy of the rubbish dumps,
Yo sobrino – yo nieto
Yo confabulador de siete suelas,
I, nephew — I, grandson
I, confabulator of seven souls,
Yo señor de las moscas
Yo descuartizador de golondrinas,
I, lord of the flies
and breaker of swallows,
Yo jugador de fútbol
Yo nadador del Estero las Toscas,
I, a soccer player,
swimmer at Estero las Toscas,
Yo violador de tumbas
Yo satanás enfermo de paperas,
I am a rapist of graves
a Satan sick with the mumps,
Yo conscripto remiso
Yo ciudadano con derecho a voto,
I, a draft-dodger
a citizen with voting rights,
Yo ovejero del diablo
Yo boxeador vencido por mi sombra,
I, the devil’s sheep
a boxer defeated by my shadow,
Yo bebedor insigne
Yo sacerdote de la buena mesa,
I drink of the symbols,
a priest of the good table,
Yo campeón de cueca
Yo campeón absoluto de tango
De guaracha, de rumba, de vals,
I champion underwear
I absolutely champion the tango,
the cha-cha, the rumba, the waltz,
Yo pastor protestante
Yo camarón, yo padre de familia,
I, a protestant pastor
a shrimp, father of a family,
Yo pequeño burgués
Yo profesor de ciencias ocultas,
I, petit bourgeois
a professor of occult sciences,
Yo comunista, yo conservador
Yo recopilador de santos viejos,
I communist, I conservative
I collector of old saints,
(Yo turista de lujo) (I, luxury tourist)
Yo ladrón de gallinas
Yo danzarín inmóvil en el aire,
I, thief of chickens
Dance immobile in the air,
Yo verdugo sin máscara
Yo semidiós egipcio con cabeza de pájaro,
I, hangman without a mask
Egyptian demigod with a bird’s head,
Yo de pie en una roca de cartón:
Háganse las tinieblas
I stand on a cardboard rock:
I become the darkness
Hágase el caos,
háganse las nubes,
Let chaos
create the clouds,
Yo delincuente nato
Sorprendido infraganti
I am a born criminal
Surprised infraganti
Robando flores a la luz de la luna
Pido perdón a diestra y siniestra
Pero no me declaro culpable.
Stealing flowers in the moonlight
I ask forgiveness from the right and left
But I do not plead guilty.
— Nicanor Parra was born this day in 1914. — Google Translate, with a little smoothing from JJM

In the end, we are only left with tomorrow. I raise my glass to the day that never arrives.— NP

How Much Labor do We Need?

Unemployment — Street crime — Poverty in the midst of plenty — Social anxiety — A young generation that feels it has no place — An aged generation living longer with diminished savings

The solution to all these problems begins with a Universal Basic Income.

The twin burdens of scarcity and toil are a deep part of our cultural legacy. There is not nearly enough of the basic necessities for all the world’s people to live in comfort and security.  A lucky few are born into wealth and a clever, evil few get away with cheating or stealing.  For the rest of us, hard work is the best guarantee of meeting our basic needs and finding a bit of peace and leisure in this harsh, competitive world.

This is no longer an accurate picture of the world, if ever it was.

  • Many animals far less clever and industrious than Homo sapiens live in a leisurely manner, sleeping and playing much of the time, hunting or grazing without a sense of desperation.
  • Accounts of hunter-gatherer societies consistently report that what we might call “work” is limited to 10 or 15 hours per week.
  • Ancient agrarian societies, say from 10,000 BC to 1900 AD, were the exception, in which there really was not enough to go around, and the leisure of each privileged man relied on the uncompensated toil of many slaves, servants or serfs.  But then…
  • I’ve been reading a utopian novel from the 19th Century full of descriptions of ways in which capitalist competition wastes effort and material, expending the lion’s share of our energies in duplicative efforts, or in trying to defeat one another.

The folly of men, not their hard-heartedness, was the great cause of the world’s poverty…I showed them how four fifths of the labor of men was utterly wasted by the mutual warfare, the lack of organization and concert among the workers…Let but the famine-stricken nation assume the function it had neglected, and regulate for the common good the course of the life-giving stream [of productive labor], and the earth would bloom like one garden, and none of its children lack any good thing. — Edward Bellamy, 1888

  • Bertrand Russell in 1932 already perceived that

Modern technic has made it possible to diminish enormously the amount of labor necessary to produce the necessaries of life for every one. This was made obvious during the [First World] War. At that time all the men in the armed forces, all the men and women engaged in the production of munitions, all the men and women engaged in spying, war propaganda, or government offices connected with the War were withdrawn from productive occupations. In spite of this, the general level of physical well-being among wage-earners on the side of the Allies was higher than before or since. The significance of this fact was concealed by finance; borrowing made it appear as if the future was nourishing the present. But that, of course, would have been impossible; a man cannot eat a loaf of bread that does not yet exist. The War showed conclusively that by the scientific organization of production it is possible to keep modern populations in fair comfort on a small part of the working capacity of the modern world. — Bertrand Russell, 1932

  • Presently, over 1/3 of the world’s food production is wasted.  Another 40%+ (depending on the report) goes to feed livestock causing extremes of pollution and global warming, while wasting 90% of the caloric content.  Simply re-distributing the world’s GDP could supply a middle-class standard of living to all 7 billion people, even without addressing the massive inefficiencies and counter-productivities of our industrial and transportation systems.
  • We are caught in a long-established habit of competing with one another not just for the comforts and pleasures of a luxurious life, but for status and rank that, by their nature, can only be available to a minority.
  • In America, 11% of all our productive time is spent in commuting, and another 10% is spent in looking for employment.  ShadowStats.com says that the real unemployment rate in America is 23%.

Today’s worker is about 10 times as productive as when Bertrand Russell wrote that Britain could live on just a fraction of its productivity.  Where has all that productivity gone?  It hasn’t gone to increase worker’s salaries for the last 40 years.  Much has been written about the runaway increase in obscene wealth that threatens to rent the fabric of our society, and the ballooning gap between the super-rich and a waning middle class.

But this huge diversion of our productivity to people who have more money than they know what to do with represents only a small fraction of the giant boon in productivity that we have inherited.  The greatest part of that has been wasted in a less obvious way: by changing the kinds of work that we do.  By my calculation, 80% of all our output is going toward zero-sum games in which we vie with one another about how to divide the pie.  Another 5% is spent in the war industry, the only function of which is to destroy lives and property, and to lay waste to nature’s bounty and beauty.

This Wikipedia page is a source for my analysis.


  • 4% of our labor goes to agriculture [ref]
  • 12% of our labor goes to primary non-farm productivity
  • 3% goes to warehousing and distribution of goods
  • 2% goes to education
  • 2% goes to research

This 23% represents what we are living on, together with our investments for the future (in knowledge, people, equipment and buildings).  It also includes everything we buy but throw away, all that we waste, buildings that will never be occupied and overstock that will never be sold, energy that goes up the chimney or is dissipated as heat.


  • 19% of our productivity goes to marketing = convincing people to buy things they didn’t know they needed. [ref]
  • 7% of our GDP is in finance – stockbrokers, bankers, financiers, insurance agents.  One way to look at their work product is a massive Casino for re-distributing wealth, in which their 7% is extracted in the process.
  • US military budget is 4% of GDP. We spend as much on our war machine as all the rest of the world’s nations combined.
  • 10% of US workers are in retail sales, though their income is only 5% of GDP
  • More than 5% of our productivity goes to incarceration of criminals.  I have not seen a full accounting of the cost of crime to the American economy, probably because so much crime goes unreported, undetected, or (in the case of very expensive white collar crime) it is actually condoned.
  • “Health care” absorbs 18% (more than twice the average for the rest of the world), but more than half of that is in overhead and paperwork for insurance.  A good deal of the rest is not making us any healthier, but is
    • defensive medicine, protecting hospitals against liability
    • treating addictions and diseases caused by self-harm
    • treating industrial accidents
    • treating iatrogenic diseases acquired in hospitals and as a result of malpractice or mistaken diagnoses
    • helping people recover from violence

    These numbers are hastily researched and approximate.  Though exact figures are hard to come by, this rough analysis shows that most of our efforts are wasted and we don’t need all of us working 40 hours a week in order to all have comfortable, middle-class life styles.  

    It will certainly turn out that some competition is healthy, and that some inequality is useful for rewarding those who contribute most to society. But the American model of competitive capitalism has produced far too much competition and far too little cooperation; also an obscene level of inequality, very little job satisfaction and chronic insecurity for most American workers.


    The big picture is that we will all be happier, healthier, and friendlier when the struggle for survival is no longer a condition of our existence.


    A simple escape from this cruel and absurd situation in which we find ourselves is the Universal Basic Income.  We recognize our collective wealth, and bestow on every citizen enough money for food and housing.  Everyone, rich and poor, gets the same monthly check. Then those who wish to read or watch TV or compose music or write a novel can do so.  Those who want to supplement their UBI can seek part- or full-time employment in a labor market that is far less crowded. The crime rate at society’s bottom will plummet because no one is desperate for survival. We will no longer have to funnel our young people into education as a way to keep them out of the job market. People will be able to retire without fear, or take a few years off from work to raise a child or to travel or to write a novel.

    A great deal of harm is being done in the modern world by the belief in the virtuousness of work, and the road to happiness and prosperity lies in an organized diminution of work. — Bertrand Russell

    The Universal Basic Income is an idea too good to be suppressed much longer. It has been proposed in Switzerland, trials are beginning in Finland. Richard Nixon sent a UBI bill to Congress. There were local experiments in Canada in the 1970s. There is a successful pilot ongoing in Brazil. There are advocates from Robert Reich to Mark Zuckerberg, Martin Luther King, Thomas Paine, Charles Murray, Elon Musk, Dan Savage, Keith Ellison and Paul Samuelson.  A new study by “serious” economists says that UBI will ad $2.5 trillion to the US economy.

    Just as important is a reduced work week.  People who have jobs complain they are working too hard, while people without jobs suffer daily anxiety and discouragement.  Americans work more hours than Europeans, but have higher unemployment.  Paid vacation in America is rarer than it was 20 years ago, and much shorter than in France, Italy or Germany.  40 hours pay for a 28-hour workweek (4 seven-hour days) would be a modest beginning.

    We speak of “wage slavery, and it”s no joke. Most people in the Western world think of their jobs as an onerous obligation. It doesn’t have to be that way. Indeed, for most of human history, it probably was not. People, given the choice, do not choose to be idle and lazy 100% of the time. Most pursue interests and projects that they perceive to be of value, and they derive deep and genuine satisfaction from this kind of work. Labor in the modern world should offer no less.

Panpsychism in the NYTimes

18wwln650-1Perhaps, they say, mind is not limited to the brains of some animals. Perhaps it is ubiquitous, present in every bit of matter, all the way up to galaxies, all the way down to electrons and neutrinos, not excluding medium-size things like a glass of water or a potted plant. Moreover, consciousness did not suddenly arise when some physical particles on a certain planet chanced to come into the right configuration; rather, there has been consciousness in the cosmos from the very beginning of time.

The doctrine that the stuff of the world is fundamentally mind-stuff goes by the name of panpsychism. A few decades ago, the American philosopher Thomas Nagel showed that it is an inescapable consequence of some quite reasonable premises.

Read more from Jim Holt, writing in the NYTimes

Replay

I find it comforting that the shocking condition of American politics is far from new, that we have grappled with worse in the past and swung back to saner times.  150 years ago, people were already decrying the common condition of the working man, and realizing that individuals were powerless to negotiate better when the only prospects for employment came from corporate giants.  Some of the violence and heavy-handed repression used to suppress labor organizations in the late 19th and early 20th centuries make you wonder that labor today is lying down without a fight. — JJM

Far from the Constitution playing any liberating part in the lives of the American people, it has robbed them of the capacity to rely on their own resources or do their own thinking. Americans are so easily hoodwinked by the sanctity of law and authority. In fact, the pattern of life has become standardized, routinized, and mechanized like canned food and Sunday sermons. Even songs are turned out like buttons or automobile tires—all cast from the same mold.

Yet I do not despair of American life. Of late there has been a new spirit manifested in the youth which is growing up with the Depression. This spirit is more purposeful though still confused. It wants to create a new world, but is not clear as to how it wants to go about it. For that reason the young generation asks for saviors. It tends to believe in dictators and to hail each new aspirant for that honor as a messiah. It wants cut-and-dried systems of salvation with a wise minority to direct society on some one-way road to utopia. It has not yet realized that it must save itself. The young generation has not yet learned that the problems confronting them can be solved only by themselves and will have to be settled on the basis of social and economic freedom in cooperation with the struggling masses for the right to the table and joy of life.

I consider Anarchism the most beautiful and practical philosophy that has yet been thought of in its application to individual expression and the relation it establishes between the individual and society. Moreover, I am certain that Anarchism is too vital and too close to human nature ever to die. It is my conviction that dictatorship, whether to the right or to the left, can never work—that it never has worked, and that time will prove this again, as it has been proved before. Considered from this point, a recrudescence of Anarchist ideas in the near future is very probable. When this occurs and takes effect, I believe that humanity will at last leave the maze in which it is now lost and will start on the path to sane living and regeneration through freedom.

— Emma Goldman, 1934 (reprinted in Harpers)